The film doesn't seem to hold back in detailing the gruesome execution, but the truth is the real execution was far, far worse than what appears on-screen. The historic account the film is based on does say a secret meeting occurred between Wallace and Edward I's young wife Margaret of France, so the only reason to use Isabella is to set up the twist of her carrying Wallace's child, breaking the news to a dying King Edward I (who actually wouldn't die for another two years).Ĭharged with treason, Wallace was sentenced to be hanged, drawn, and quartered. The thing is, Isabella would have been three years old at the time, and still in France. Instead, she secretly has a tryst with the freedom fighter, clearly unable to resist his charms. A key figure in the film is Isabella of France ( Sophie Marceau), wife of Edward II who was sent to negotiate with Wallace. It's not only an insult to a historic figure, but to moviegoers as well. Her real name was Marion Braidfute, changed for the film so as not to be confused with Robin Hood's Maid Marian. The indignity around the figure is that Murron wasn't even her name. That event did happen, and while it wasn't the catalyst of Wallace's vendetta against the English, it was the straw that broke the back. Wallace's wife Murron MacClannough ( Catherine McCormack) is publicly executed in the film. Women do not fare much better in the film. There's no evidence that Edward II even was gay, nor is there any record that 1st Earl of Cornwall Piers Gaveston (named 'Phillip' in the film, played by Stephen Billington), who in the film as Edward's male lover, was pushed out a window to his death by King Edward I ( Patrick McGoohan), although he was sent into exile by the monarch. Edward II is portrayed not only as homosexual but also as weak, impotent, and effeminate. The harshest stereotype, however, is given to Edward II ( Peter Hanly). While the Scottish are made out as manly men, the English are portrayed as much weaker and more feminine overall. The kilts and belted plaid in the film weren't worn by the Scots until the late-16th century, problematic for a film set in the 13th century (for that matter, English soldiers wouldn't have had matching royal uniforms). In actuality, Wallace was born in the Southwest of Scotland, the son of a minor nobleman. A young Wallace and his family, in the film, are poor farmers living in a Highland glen. If that were indeed true, then Braveheart has arguably the most realistic portrayal of Scots on film. It’s like crazy.When one pictures a Scot, the image typically depicted is one of a working-class, kilt-wearing ruffian playing bagpipes. I mean you’re in hell and you’re watching the angels fall. "Because you’re going into other realms and stuff. “I have two scripts and one of them is very structured and very strong script and kind of more what should expect and the other is like an acid trip," said Gibson. In an interview, Gibson confirmed that the film is “coming soon” and that there are two scripts – one more linear and the other more like an “acid trip”. However, it seems like plans for the sequel are going ahead, with the film reportedly focusing on the three days between Jesus' death and resurrection, where many Christians believe Jesus descended into Hell. Many thought this was just a rumour or even a joke, as the current title for the supposed sequel is the rather hilarious / bordering on action caper parody _The Passion of the Christ: Resurrection -_which sounds like a Family Guy 'Passion of the Christ 2: Crucify This' sketch rather than another biblically-faithful R-rated epic. There have long been whispers that Mel Gibson was close to shooting a sequel to his 2004 biblical epic The Passion of the Christ, with actor Jim Caviezel reprising his role as Jesus.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |